17.8
98.2 %
97 %
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is good, 98.2%.
Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.
The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.
Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.
Publication data is available only after login.
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 12.3 | 11.9 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 7.7 | 10.6 | 16.8 | 80.3 | 98.2% | 1.0 |
| Article, other | 4.5 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 6.1 | NA | 24.1 | 98.6% | 0.2 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | 0.2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 0.2 | 100.0% | 1.0 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | NA | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| Patent | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.0% | 0.0 |
| DiVA publication type | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | Publications | WoS coverage | Scopus coverage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article, peer review | 27 | 31 | 31 | 26 | 21 | 27 | 45 | 208 | 98.1% | 1 |
| Article, other | 7 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 6 | 10 | NA | 39 | 97.4% | 0 |
| Conference paper, peer review | NA | 1 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 100.0% | 1 |
| Doctoral thesis | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Patent | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 12.3 | 78.7 | 6.4 | 0.1 | 1.2% |
| 2015 | 12.1 | 64.9 | 5.4 | 0.9 | 7.2% |
| 2016 | 11.7 | 67.4 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 8.2% |
| 2017 | 10.6 | 92.1 | 8.7 | 0.8 | 7.4% |
| 2018 | 7.8 | 51.6 | 6.6 | 0.5 | 6.4% |
| Total | 54.5 | 354.7 | 6.5 | 3.3 | 6.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average Cf | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 35.9 | 1.04 | 3.0 | 8.5% |
| 2015-2017 | 33.2 | 1.02 | 2.1 | 6.5% |
| 2016-2018 | 29.0 | 0.90 | 1.1 | 3.9% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.8 | 0.95 | 1.2 | 4.4% |
| Total | 63.7 | 1.00 | 4.3 | 6.7% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 98%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 72 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 98.9%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average Journal Cf | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 35.9 | 1.52 | 18.0 | 50.1% |
| 2015-2017 | 33.2 | 1.47 | 16.5 | 49.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 29.0 | 1.49 | 16.9 | 58.3% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.8 | 1.48 | 17.5 | 63.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 32.6 | 1.37 | 17.1 | 52.3% |
| Total | 78.1 | 1.44 | 39.5 | 50.6% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 72 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.4%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Swedish non-university co-publications | Share Swedish non-university | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 90 | 2 | 2.2% | 44 | 48.9% |
| 2015-2017 | 88 | 2 | 2.3% | 47 | 53.4% |
| 2016-2018 | 78 | 3 | 3.8% | 36 | 46.2% |
| 2017-2019 | 72 | 8 | 11.1% | 31 | 43.1% |
| 2018-2020 | 87 | 8 | 9.2% | 37 | 42.5% |
| Total | 202 | 11 | 5.4% | 95 | 47.0% |
This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 72 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 96.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 20 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Italy | 17 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.6 |
| Norway | 26 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4.9 |
| Germany | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2.1 |
| India | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.0 |
| Poland | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 |
| United States | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Japan | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Spain | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| France | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Austria | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| Finland | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Estonia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Organization | Organization type | Country | Publications | 1-10 auth | 11-50 auth | 51-200 auth | Over 200 auth | Publications (frac) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan University | University | China | 15 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.4 |
| University of Bergen | University | Norway | 25 | 21 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 |
| University of Sannio | University | Italy | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.9 |
| Stockholm University | University | Sweden | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.9 |
| Novus Scientific AB | Company | Sweden | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.7 |
| Guizhou University | University | China | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Jagiellonian University in Krakow | University | Poland | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.3 |
| RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden | Institute | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Indian Institutes of Technology | University | India | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| University of Milan | University | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Karolinska Institutet | University | Sweden | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.1 |
| Temple University | University | United States | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 |
| Chalmers University of Technology | University | Sweden | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| Julius Maximilian University of Wurzburg | University | Germany | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| RWTH Aachen University | University | Germany | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| University of Salerno | University | Italy | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.9 |
| University of Sheffield | University | United Kingdom | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.8 |
| DiaCoating GmbH | Company | Austria | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Polytechnic University of Turin | University | Italy | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Billerud Korsnäs AB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) | Other Public | India | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 |
| Polish Academy of Science | Other | Poland | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Linköping University | University | Sweden | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine Networking Biomedical Research Centre (CIBER-BBN) | Institute | Spain | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Polytechnic University of Valencia (UPV) | University | Spain | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Haukeland University Hospital | University Hospital | Norway | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Amirkabir University of Technology | University | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| Tsinghua University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Tokyo | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| University of Gothenburg | University | Sweden | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 |
| ENN Group | Company | China | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Würzburg | University | Germany | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| DWI-Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials | Institute | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| IMT Lille Douai | NA | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Inventia AB | Institute | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| University of Strasbourg | University | France | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| Fraunhofer Institute for Interfacial Engineering and Biotechnology (IGB) | Institute | Germany | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 |
| ABB | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Materia Nova | Company | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| RIKEN | Institute | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Mons | University | Belgium | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Vetenskapens Hus | Other | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Norwegian University of Science and Technology | University | Norway | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa (JDU) | University | Poland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| University of Turku | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.3 |
| Skövde University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Tehran | University | Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Oslo | University | Norway | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Harvard University | University | United States | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Borås University College | University College | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| ETH Zurich | University | Switzerland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul | University | Brazil | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Indian Inst Technol Delhi Hauz Khas | NA | India | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Linnaeus University | University | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Nagoya University | University | Japan | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| National Research Council (CNR) | Other Public | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Vattenfall | Company | Sweden | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Cardiff University | University | United Kingdom | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Tartu | University | Estonia | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Toronto | University | Canada | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| University of Hamburg | University | Germany | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Valencia | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Valladolid | University | Spain | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Georgia Regents University | University | United States | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Innovhub Experimental Stations for Industry srl | Company | Italy | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Lanzhou University | University | China | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| BioMediTech | Institute | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Tampere University Hospital | University Hospital | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Tampere | University | Finland | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) | Institute | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Korea University of Science and Technology | University | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Oslo University Hospital | University Hospital | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Pohang University of Science and Technology | University | Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| SINTEF | Institute | Norway | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Esslingen University of Applied Sciences | University College | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Medical University of Graz | University | Austria | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Reutlingen University | University College | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Stuttgart | University | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| University of Parma | University | Italy | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Fraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research (ISC) | Institute | Germany | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Innsbruck Medical University | University | Austria | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| Colorado State University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Eindhoven University of Technology | University | Netherlands | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Georgia Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Massachusetts Institute of Technology | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Northwestern University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Soochow University | University | China | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Stanford University | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) | University | Switzerland | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Akron | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Bordeaux | University | France | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of California, Los Angeles | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Chicago | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Colorado Boulder | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| University of Delaware | University | United States | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Publication Year | Publications | Open Access publications | OA gold | OA hybrid | OA green | OA bronze | Not OA | Share OA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 27 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 25.9% |
| 2015 | 32 | 12 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 37.5% |
| 2016 | 31 | 25 | 3 | 20 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 80.6% |
| 2017 | 27 | 9 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 33.3% |
| 2018 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 52.4% |
| 2019 | 29 | 13 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 44.8% |
| 2020 | 45 | 30 | 10 | 18 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 66.7% |
| Total | 212 | 107 | 24 | 72 | 5 | 6 | 105 | 50.5% |
The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.
In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:
Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.
Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.
Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.
Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.
N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.
| Publication Year | Publications | Total Citations | Average Citations | Uncited publications | Share uncited |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 12.3 | 218.0 | 17.7 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2015 | 12.1 | 261.6 | 21.7 | 0.2 | 1.7% |
| 2016 | 11.7 | 166.0 | 14.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2017 | 9.6 | 138.5 | 14.4 | 0.5 | 5.6% |
| 2018 | 7.8 | 80.8 | 10.4 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2019 | 12.2 | 85.1 | 6.9 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| 2020 | 14.5 | 68.8 | 4.8 | 0.8 | 5.4% |
| Total | 80.2 | 1018.7 | 12.7 | 1.5 | 1.9% |
| Publication years | Publications | Average FWCI | Top 10% publications | Share Top 10% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 36.1 | 1.09 | 3.0 | 8.2% |
| 2015-2017 | 32.8 | 1.08 | 1.3 | 3.9% |
| 2016-2018 | 28.5 | 0.93 | 0.5 | 1.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 27.6 | 1.01 | 1.1 | 3.9% |
| Total | 63.7 | 1.06 | 4.0 | 6.3% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 73 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 98.8%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
| Publication years | Publications | Average SNIP | Publications in Top 20% journals | Share Top 20% journals |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 35.7 | 1.32 | 23.3 | 65.3% |
| 2015-2017 | 33.0 | 1.47 | 22.1 | 66.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 28.7 | 1.54 | 21.4 | 74.6% |
| 2017-2019 | 28.1 | 1.55 | 22.2 | 79.0% |
| 2018-2020 | 32.5 | 1.37 | 20.8 | 63.9% |
| Total | 77.9 | 1.42 | 50.6 | 65.0% |
| Publication years | Publications | Corporate co-publications | Share corporate | International co-publications | Share international |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-2016 | 91 | 3 | 3.3% | 44 | 48.4% |
| 2015-2017 | 89 | 2 | 2.2% | 47 | 52.8% |
| 2016-2018 | 79 | 2 | 2.5% | 37 | 46.8% |
| 2017-2019 | 74 | 0 | 0.0% | 32 | 43.2% |
| 2018-2020 | 89 | 1 | 1.1% | 39 | 43.8% |
| Total | 205 | 4 | 2.0% | 97 | 47.3% |
This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 74 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 95.7%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
